The clauses in an agreement that provides for a period during which one of the parties cannot terminate the contract are referred to as a blocking clause. If a contractor terminates the contract within the suspension period, such a clause stipulates that the contrasens must pay the rent for the remainder of the prohibition period, even if he would no longer use the premise granted because of the termination of the contract. The owner must pay you compensation if he wants to terminate the contract during the blocking of period 1. If the violation of the conditions of the blockage within the time limit results in the payment of compensation costs for the tenants, then in your case, the lessor is actually obliged to pay the same. Therefore, if the restraining clause in a leave and licensing agreement stipulates that the licensee is required, in the event of a breach of that clause, to pay the rent for the remaining blackout period, i.e. the 33-month rent, it is not really applicable in court. Only a right to an actual violation of the victim can be invoked, while he must prove the following elements to assert an effective right: … maximum rental period granted and extended by the DMRC. There will be a 15-month prohibition period and the sublicensing will not be able to do so for the first 15 months from the beginning of the licence – for the payment of an amount equal to the licence fee payable over the duration of the 15-month prohibition period. (highlighted) 6. Apparently, the rights of… Period of agreement.
The „end date“ agreed in the aforementioned concession agreement was „the end of the 12-year concession period from the beginning or date of the previous fixing… 1) Yes, you can leave after the leave clause and the license agreement. B. Notice clause – notification period clause contains the conditions under which landlords or tenants can inform each other of the termination of the contract. Contracting parties may set each other`s length of notice period and these may be subject to conditions. … 31.3.2015 and Article 9.4 (C) of the Information Memorandum, which provides for a three-year ban period before India`s largest shareholder can dilute its capital below 51%. The facts of the case… It`s tilted. We can point out that the purpose of the prohibition period, during which the majority shareholder must not dilute its capital under a certain imposed limit, is to prevent the trade in licences.